<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pocarr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pocarr.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pocarr.com</link>
	<description>Enhance Your Hand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5 hyperturbo (underdogggg@) + $7 180man (r3tr0sp3ct) by PortlyPig</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-hyperturbo-underdogggg-7-180man-r3tr0sp3ct/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>PortlyPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=644#comment-181</guid>
		<description>4.48, J7o, Not so fine. Hand just doesn&#039;t play well enough when we have to R/C. People like to take marginal spots in hypers, so their ranges won&#039;t be that tight. Folding is best.

7.04, A4o, Looks like a good spot to shove over a limper. Unless stats are scary. Limpers just don&#039;t L/C wide enough. 

23.03 Jxs, Occasionally r/f there OTB. If we gave a walk last hand (we didn&#039;t), then it&#039;s a good spot to r/f imo. Careful who you are raising into though!

23.19, A9s, Too wide. AJ 77 KQs seems like a good range to me. A9s/ATo is too wide

24.47, A4s, I like the raise. Folding isn&#039;t an option. Just becareful who you are raising into. if they are crazy, or know our r/f range is huge your prob better off just jamming

26.15, make sure you are only trapping people that you know who they are, but they don&#039;t know who you are. Won&#039;t happen often. 

27.52, A5o, I don&#039;t mind this raise :) . A blocker helps a lot. It is fine that we only r/c one person. A lot depends on our image and often the other guys are folding. As a pure steal (r/f to all) it has to work about 50% of the time, which means that they have to play back around 13% of the time for it to be bad. And with A blocker 13% is quite wide. Prob not c-betting that board.

28.56, J7s, Shoving will be profitable, but seems too risky. Most likely raising, shoving is fine, I think folding is worst

29.43, K7o, Depends whose raising, but this will be a rejam often. Sometimes rejamming ATC here will be profitable, but I don&#039;t recommend it. Just try to think about ranges and how often they are r/f. 

30.50, ATo, paying for info is bad unless its a reg imo. Tempting to jam river.

38.45, J3o, Don&#039;t like limping a hand that flops poorly. Much rather R/F. Looks like we need to R/f more HU

39.48, 64o, When I talk about negative edge because our stack goes from 52k to 49.5k, I AM WRONG. It is already calculated in wiz that our stack is 49k when we fold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.48, J7o, Not so fine. Hand just doesn&#8217;t play well enough when we have to R/C. People like to take marginal spots in hypers, so their ranges won&#8217;t be that tight. Folding is best.</p>
<p>7.04, A4o, Looks like a good spot to shove over a limper. Unless stats are scary. Limpers just don&#8217;t L/C wide enough. </p>
<p>23.03 Jxs, Occasionally r/f there OTB. If we gave a walk last hand (we didn&#8217;t), then it&#8217;s a good spot to r/f imo. Careful who you are raising into though!</p>
<p>23.19, A9s, Too wide. AJ 77 KQs seems like a good range to me. A9s/ATo is too wide</p>
<p>24.47, A4s, I like the raise. Folding isn&#8217;t an option. Just becareful who you are raising into. if they are crazy, or know our r/f range is huge your prob better off just jamming</p>
<p>26.15, make sure you are only trapping people that you know who they are, but they don&#8217;t know who you are. Won&#8217;t happen often. </p>
<p>27.52, A5o, I don&#8217;t mind this raise <img src='http://pocarr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . A blocker helps a lot. It is fine that we only r/c one person. A lot depends on our image and often the other guys are folding. As a pure steal (r/f to all) it has to work about 50% of the time, which means that they have to play back around 13% of the time for it to be bad. And with A blocker 13% is quite wide. Prob not c-betting that board.</p>
<p>28.56, J7s, Shoving will be profitable, but seems too risky. Most likely raising, shoving is fine, I think folding is worst</p>
<p>29.43, K7o, Depends whose raising, but this will be a rejam often. Sometimes rejamming ATC here will be profitable, but I don&#8217;t recommend it. Just try to think about ranges and how often they are r/f. </p>
<p>30.50, ATo, paying for info is bad unless its a reg imo. Tempting to jam river.</p>
<p>38.45, J3o, Don&#8217;t like limping a hand that flops poorly. Much rather R/F. Looks like we need to R/f more HU</p>
<p>39.48, 64o, When I talk about negative edge because our stack goes from 52k to 49.5k, I AM WRONG. It is already calculated in wiz that our stack is 49k when we fold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5 hyperturbo (underdogggg@) + $7 180man (r3tr0sp3ct) by PortlyPig</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-hyperturbo-underdogggg-7-180man-r3tr0sp3ct/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>PortlyPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=644#comment-180</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s close, and probably not as bad as I made it out to be. Did I make it out to be that bad? However, I think it is marginal AT BEST. 

I know donni won&#039;t be that wide given the BB, and the SB will be even tighter due to both the BB and Donni. To assume SB is looser than AJ+ 77+, is just too big of assumption. The chips we gain are worth less than the chips we lose. However, it does put us in a spot where we can bully the table heavily, whereas if we fold we can only slightly bully. But we just aren&#039;t winning the pot enough of the time imo. 

Vs ranges of 
SB: 66+,ATs+,KQs,AJo+
CO: 22+,A2s+,K8s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s,A8o+,KTo+,QJo
it is -cEV. Also, These ranges are wide, there is a great chance that they are tighter, and little chance that they are wider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s close, and probably not as bad as I made it out to be. Did I make it out to be that bad? However, I think it is marginal AT BEST. </p>
<p>I know donni won&#8217;t be that wide given the BB, and the SB will be even tighter due to both the BB and Donni. To assume SB is looser than AJ+ 77+, is just too big of assumption. The chips we gain are worth less than the chips we lose. However, it does put us in a spot where we can bully the table heavily, whereas if we fold we can only slightly bully. But we just aren&#8217;t winning the pot enough of the time imo. </p>
<p>Vs ranges of<br />
SB: 66+,ATs+,KQs,AJo+<br />
CO: 22+,A2s+,K8s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s,A8o+,KTo+,QJo<br />
it is -cEV. Also, These ranges are wide, there is a great chance that they are tighter, and little chance that they are wider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $2 180man HHReview (Rock0900) by PortlyPig</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/2-180man-hhreview-rock0900/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>PortlyPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=684#comment-179</guid>
		<description>0.55 hand 2, 44. As mentioned, they don&#039;t like to fold and will even float with overs, so there are a lot of scary turns. Just C/F flop. 

1.52 hand 16, TT. My range of 99/88 is for loose randoms. I expect looser randoms to open hands such as ATs from that position and call AJ 77. Vs Regs whose opening range (min&#039;ish raise not 3x) is likely 88 AQ or thereabouts, and they will call something like JJ AK (JJ and AK are very marginal vs a regs 3b jam Im not even sure if its good) since our rejam is so tight. I like to lean on the cautious side here, because it&#039;s a spot where if we are right, we gain minimal chips, but if we are wrong we lose a lot in the LR. 
Vs regs JJ AK&#039;ish because both r and r/c ranges are tight
vs randoms TT AQs - 88 AQo depending.

3.00 hand 18, QQ. 3b vs Randoms. Flatting vs Regs. Games are a bit tougher these days so even flatting vs the tighter randoms here is fine. We are flatting because if we 3b, he is only continuing with QQ+. So flatting keeps his range wider and opens up for potential spazzes behind.

4.20 hand 30, A8s. Normally we don&#039;t make it so big, but I suggest it because we are OOP and making it this bigmeans it&#039;s just a lot easier to play. Shoving is also fine. 

5.46 hand 44, 42o. Just jamming vs 99% of people who limp bvb with that stack

6.21 hand 48, A3o. R/F from this position with a blocker isn&#039;t bad, but just be careful who you are raising into. If they know our R/c range/ continuation range  is something like AQ 88, then they could probably 3b us with ATC. However, if they are tight and not much of a thinking player, then this raise only has to work 49% of the time, meaning that they need to have a rejam/play back range of 16% each. Which is wide. HOWEVER, becareful. It is very exploitable, so keep an eye on who you are raising into.

9.35 hand 62, T6s. I was a bit unclear here. ATC vs randoms, 90% vs loose regs. It&#039;s likely profitable to be ATC vs everyone, however I want a  bit of an edge and to show the regs I am capable of folding bvb occasionally. For most of you guys, who regs don&#039;t really have much history, lean towards aggression and shove.

10.15 hand 64, 22. Shoving. He&#039;s just not limp/calling enough

16.28 hand 9, QJs. I don&#039;t like limping from this position. Too many people to get through. If we were CO, im fine with it

19.16, hand 25, KQs. standard raise.

21.44, hand 45, ATo. Those ranges are very loose imo. My range now would be something like A8o, A2s, any two broadways, K6s, Q7s, J7s, T7s, 97s, 87s, 76s. 

22.24, hand 48, A6o. A6o does terrible multiway. Rather have something like 76s. 

Overall, the ranges I put into seem to be very wide. 

26.23, hand 56, ATo. Wrong. Since he has us covered our required odds are lowered. Pot is 5410 - 885 = 4525 We now need 40.46% eq. So, marginal vs randoms. Easy call vs regs

27.51, hand 72. QJo. Raising because our hand does well enough vs an ATC range (BB), same as the 55 hand previous You can still be decently wide, but you want to take some% of your range because we are going to showdown 100%, well, unless we r/f which is fine. 33+,A4+,A2s+,K8+,K4s+,Q9+,Q6s+,JT,J8s+,T8s+ seems fine here

28.56, hand 83, Kx. Shoving vs Limper. They raise their premiums, so their r/c range is so narrow

33.05, hand 106, K7s. Not bottom of my range, since we know SB is able to fold I would probably go down to K5s. I&#039;m more of a fan of raising now, since players are better and flat less, and it just looks strong, so r/f isn&#039;t too bad, but I would have to be confident on how the players will react behind. Shove on flop is no good.

38.57, hand 135, JTo. If I was BTN and you were SB, my raising range would be very small. My shoving range would still consist of broadways and some SCs, but my raising range is really tight.

39.56, hand 139, no point letting them battle it out when they have to be really tight. Shove or raise

42.13, hand 153, Q5o. Almost always shoving this, but since they are spazzing they are hurting our eq. But, normally with a CL like this we can be ATC here. 

I would stop raising vs these guys. Shoving big is fine

Would give fewer walks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.55 hand 2, 44. As mentioned, they don&#8217;t like to fold and will even float with overs, so there are a lot of scary turns. Just C/F flop. </p>
<p>1.52 hand 16, TT. My range of 99/88 is for loose randoms. I expect looser randoms to open hands such as ATs from that position and call AJ 77. Vs Regs whose opening range (min&#8217;ish raise not 3x) is likely 88 AQ or thereabouts, and they will call something like JJ AK (JJ and AK are very marginal vs a regs 3b jam Im not even sure if its good) since our rejam is so tight. I like to lean on the cautious side here, because it&#8217;s a spot where if we are right, we gain minimal chips, but if we are wrong we lose a lot in the LR.<br />
Vs regs JJ AK&#8217;ish because both r and r/c ranges are tight<br />
vs randoms TT AQs &#8211; 88 AQo depending.</p>
<p>3.00 hand 18, QQ. 3b vs Randoms. Flatting vs Regs. Games are a bit tougher these days so even flatting vs the tighter randoms here is fine. We are flatting because if we 3b, he is only continuing with QQ+. So flatting keeps his range wider and opens up for potential spazzes behind.</p>
<p>4.20 hand 30, A8s. Normally we don&#8217;t make it so big, but I suggest it because we are OOP and making it this bigmeans it&#8217;s just a lot easier to play. Shoving is also fine. </p>
<p>5.46 hand 44, 42o. Just jamming vs 99% of people who limp bvb with that stack</p>
<p>6.21 hand 48, A3o. R/F from this position with a blocker isn&#8217;t bad, but just be careful who you are raising into. If they know our R/c range/ continuation range  is something like AQ 88, then they could probably 3b us with ATC. However, if they are tight and not much of a thinking player, then this raise only has to work 49% of the time, meaning that they need to have a rejam/play back range of 16% each. Which is wide. HOWEVER, becareful. It is very exploitable, so keep an eye on who you are raising into.</p>
<p>9.35 hand 62, T6s. I was a bit unclear here. ATC vs randoms, 90% vs loose regs. It&#8217;s likely profitable to be ATC vs everyone, however I want a  bit of an edge and to show the regs I am capable of folding bvb occasionally. For most of you guys, who regs don&#8217;t really have much history, lean towards aggression and shove.</p>
<p>10.15 hand 64, 22. Shoving. He&#8217;s just not limp/calling enough</p>
<p>16.28 hand 9, QJs. I don&#8217;t like limping from this position. Too many people to get through. If we were CO, im fine with it</p>
<p>19.16, hand 25, KQs. standard raise.</p>
<p>21.44, hand 45, ATo. Those ranges are very loose imo. My range now would be something like A8o, A2s, any two broadways, K6s, Q7s, J7s, T7s, 97s, 87s, 76s. </p>
<p>22.24, hand 48, A6o. A6o does terrible multiway. Rather have something like 76s. </p>
<p>Overall, the ranges I put into seem to be very wide. </p>
<p>26.23, hand 56, ATo. Wrong. Since he has us covered our required odds are lowered. Pot is 5410 &#8211; 885 = 4525 We now need 40.46% eq. So, marginal vs randoms. Easy call vs regs</p>
<p>27.51, hand 72. QJo. Raising because our hand does well enough vs an ATC range (BB), same as the 55 hand previous You can still be decently wide, but you want to take some% of your range because we are going to showdown 100%, well, unless we r/f which is fine. 33+,A4+,A2s+,K8+,K4s+,Q9+,Q6s+,JT,J8s+,T8s+ seems fine here</p>
<p>28.56, hand 83, Kx. Shoving vs Limper. They raise their premiums, so their r/c range is so narrow</p>
<p>33.05, hand 106, K7s. Not bottom of my range, since we know SB is able to fold I would probably go down to K5s. I&#8217;m more of a fan of raising now, since players are better and flat less, and it just looks strong, so r/f isn&#8217;t too bad, but I would have to be confident on how the players will react behind. Shove on flop is no good.</p>
<p>38.57, hand 135, JTo. If I was BTN and you were SB, my raising range would be very small. My shoving range would still consist of broadways and some SCs, but my raising range is really tight.</p>
<p>39.56, hand 139, no point letting them battle it out when they have to be really tight. Shove or raise</p>
<p>42.13, hand 153, Q5o. Almost always shoving this, but since they are spazzing they are hurting our eq. But, normally with a CL like this we can be ATC here. </p>
<p>I would stop raising vs these guys. Shoving big is fine</p>
<p>Would give fewer walks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $109r MTT HHReview (CrazyHorse76) Part 3 by Pokerlam</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/109r-mtt-hhreview-crazyhorse76-part-3/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokerlam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=559#comment-178</guid>
		<description>I would prefer a shove with 55 27:00, you can earn 12400 chips with a 43k stack and good equity if called. What do you think about that, since you only discuss calling/ folding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer a shove with 55 27:00, you can earn 12400 chips with a 43k stack and good equity if called. What do you think about that, since you only discuss calling/ folding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5.50 MTT HHReview (euphony1) Part 4 by Talewine09</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-50-mtt-hhreview-euphony1-part-4/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Talewine09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 08:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=705#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Crazyhorse, are you against r/f the turn with k3o and if we get a call ch/c the river? or ch/f? seemed like an interesting spot, but i&#039;m leading the turn and re-evaluating other actions. any input would be greatly appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazyhorse, are you against r/f the turn with k3o and if we get a call ch/c the river? or ch/f? seemed like an interesting spot, but i&#8217;m leading the turn and re-evaluating other actions. any input would be greatly appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $26 MTT HHReview (2DogsHumpin) Part 3 by 2dogshumpin</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/26-mtt-hhreview-2dogshumpin-part-3/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>2dogshumpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 11:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=665#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Totally helpful...too bad i can&#039;t implement lol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally helpful&#8230;too bad i can&#8217;t implement lol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5.50 MTT HHReview (euphony1) Part 2 by Dominator1984</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-50-mtt-hhreview-euphony1-part-2/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominator1984</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=698#comment-175</guid>
		<description>you asked about the flush draw what I would do when a blank came on the turn I would check behind and give up when a blank came and he leads. when checked on the river i would make a bluff bet like 25-35% pot bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you asked about the flush draw what I would do when a blank came on the turn I would check behind and give up when a blank came and he leads. when checked on the river i would make a bluff bet like 25-35% pot bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5.50 2r1a MTT HHReview (LillaLejonet) Part 1 by msusyr24</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-50-2r1a-mtt-hhreview-lillalejonet-part-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>msusyr24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=682#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I certainly missed that hand.  Thank you for pointing that out.  The T8o is almost certainly a shove.  Your only options are raise/fold and folding is likely inferior to shoving.  

And yes lilla, this is very good so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly missed that hand.  Thank you for pointing that out.  The T8o is almost certainly a shove.  Your only options are raise/fold and folding is likely inferior to shoving.  </p>
<p>And yes lilla, this is very good so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5.50 2r1a MTT HHReview (LillaLejonet) Part 1 by lillalejonet</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-50-2r1a-mtt-hhreview-lillalejonet-part-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>lillalejonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=682#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the part 1 and the comment, I think I played it really good so far, the only error was prolly the last hand where I should have shoved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the part 1 and the comment, I think I played it really good so far, the only error was prolly the last hand where I should have shoved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $5.50 2r1a MTT HHReview (LillaLejonet) Part 1 by jAkDAriPAA</title>
		<link>http://pocarr.com/videos/5-50-2r1a-mtt-hhreview-lillalejonet-part-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>jAkDAriPAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocarr.com/?post_type=videos&#038;p=682#comment-172</guid>
		<description>a lot of your bet sizing is really top notch, really impressive video.  Blind v blind is the only times i saw what i consider mistakes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of your bet sizing is really top notch, really impressive video.  Blind v blind is the only times i saw what i consider mistakes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

